Timestamps

---

How come the timestamps on the photo's on 1-18-08.com are from January, yet the footage in the film is from May?

RE: Timestamps

---

Lol, wow that takes me back.

The timestamps are from January because that's when the movie was to come out. If you notice all of pictures from the party and of the milatary in New York say the 18th. In fact, most of us were counting on the movie to be based on the night it came out. But it wasn't.

I probably missed it, or they havn't told us yet, but they decided to have it later on in the year. So the movie taking place in May is what they did.

RE: Timestamps

---

I thought that might have been it, but you would have thought that they would updatethe photo's to match

I only saw it last night, I was impressed, I didn't actually think it would be that good. Lets just hope they don't screw it all up with the sequal/s (like the matrix)

RE: Timestamps

---

Well, the movie's over so there's no chance of them fixing the time lol.

As for sequels, we'll just have to wait and see if they even to make them. Then we'll worry about if they're going to be good or not.

RE: Timestamps

---

There is word of a sequel actually being green-lit. JJ Abrams and Matt Reeves talked with some people at Paramount about possibly doing one. But realistically speaking, we probably won't hear of one until JJ Abrams wraps up the filming for the new Star Trek film.

Beam me up, Scotty. xD

RE: Timestamps

---

Personaly I like "He's dead Jim." But yeah.

Hmmm, a sequel. They have the manga covering the events before, all the viral marketing between it and the film, the film itself... so it's either a sequel as in it takes place afterwards, or a sidequel and takes place during the same time. Or maybe it's both.