Review Numero Uno (Sensitive to your Spoiler Needs)
Posted on January 18th, 2008 at 8:20 pm in Reviews |
Hey all. Yooka is back. I return to give you two things; an unbiased review from a literary/cinematic perspective, and my impressions on a more personal level. Expect a helluva lot of reading. However, I will not be offended if you skim. :)
I was fortunate enough to work at a place that lets off early thanks to the good Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King. That is why I saw the movie during the day, and am able to get this review out to you super early. As the title suggests, I will clearly label when the spoilers are a-comin’!!!
I was also thoughtful enough to go with friends, and to have a bit of good ole’ Irish whiskey in me during the film. So that even if the odds and ends I picked up accidently from the commercials and the internet proved true, at least the evening wouldn’t be totally ruined for me. For all you young, budding alcoholics out there, I cannot emphasize enough how much I recommend flasks for a truly wonderful theater experience. However, since the buzz is still with me, I also much apologize for any extraneous rambling, or careless spelling or grammatical errors. Also, the spellchecker is giving me an XML error. Stupid spellchecker.
I also want to take this opportunity to thank Jordan for keeping up with the site during my exodus. From what little I’ve read, you’ve experienced first hand why I left. I hope no one spoiled it too bad for you. I also want to compliment you on being “teh lil’ hotness”.
K. On to the movie. No, no spoilers just yet. I’ll tell you when.
The first half hour or so was exactly what the beginning of the first trailer let on. It was a well-done camcorder collage of a love affair. The great thing about this stile of filmmaking is that it doesn’t demand very much of the actors, and I think that shows through. The party, and all the Rob & Beth “lubbie dubbie” stuff feels real enough because, basically, they are just being themselves. It gets the job done, much like the opening minutes of Blair Witch. I recommend those who haven’t yet seen it to allow themselves to put themselves in their shoes from the get go. Get personally involved, mentally immerse yourself in the high school-ish drama, and imagine that you are in their place. Pretend you are that male or female (whicever floats your boat more). You’ll get more out of the movie, and little curveballs that the director will throw at you will be more effective down the road.
Oh, I feel ashamed that I haven’t said it yet… but you simply must see this in theaters. It’s a good movie, but out of theaters, it loses most of the effect, (again) much like Blair Witch.
Alright, from this point forward…. Here Be Spoilars!!! Aaaargh!!
————————————–
Maybe it’s because I practically memorized the first trailer, but I was stilll surprised by the first signs of the monster. Much of what is in that trailer never made it to the final cut. I believe that to be a smart decision from the filmmaker. I found myself looking at the lady liberty’s head before I knew what was happening. And to the credit of the director, you stray far from the initial trailer with over an hour left in the film.
You find that the characters have more than enough opportunity to leave New York City, but because Rob gets a call from Beth, they work there way back into (the new) “Ground Zero”. Think about that from a writer’s perspective for a second. You have a catastrophe. And realistically, Godzilla can only take out so many people. Humans - even in NYC - have a tendency to evacuate. The Cloverfield Monster does not kill all New Yorkers. Far from it.
The filmmakers also do a great job of acknowledging that New York City has a subterrainian landscape unlike all but a handful of cities in the world. It’s quite possible that there are thousands of tunnels that stretch miles in all directions under Manhattan Island, as we’ve been tunneling here since the 1800’s, and basically never stopped. The monster, somehow, has a plan of attack here too, as the “parasite” rumors come to fruition in the subway tunnels under Manhattan. Long story short: Everyone gets away from the big monster, and his spider-like offspring. But it turns out the spiders have a vampire/zombie/Sigourney-Weaver’s-Alien’s-like trait to their bites… and a cast member dies horribly because of it. Honestly, I didn’t see this coming. This also gives a good reason as to why the monster targets NYC - plenty of fresh hosts for it’s babies.
At this point, we are suprisingly low on cast members. We are rewarded for turning back (and away from safety) as miraculously, we do find Beth. In trying to find safety afterwards, we lose everyone but Rob and Beth, though the do compensate us by great shots of the monster. Great. Shots. Thankfully, I was not spoofed, the monster did not look like The Iron Giant. It looked good. If you want more detail, you’ll have to see the film, because I’m not sayin’ any more. :)
The ending is good, in that it follows logically from what has already happened. It is also somewhat ambigious. In this wat, it reminds me of the Matrix sequels, and I won’t be suprised if it disappoints people. The final outcome of the monster is not immediately known after all is said and done. A round of carpet bombing succeeds in aggravating the monster, but hours later (after daybreak), it is still shown that the nation is taking extremely aggressive measures. Also, the survival of Rob and Beth is also unknown, as they take adequete shelter for the camera to survive, but they leave room to believe that they may or may not have made it.
In closing, let me say two last things. First, about the ending. Some will probably say that they flash of light was a large bomb to annhiliate the beast. That is true, but I highly doubt it was The Bomb. And if it was, they didn’t do their homework. The flash is large, but it is orange, not white. All accounts of atomic bombs involve white light. I don’t know if Rob and Beth lived through everything, but I know for sure that they weren’t obliterated in a Hiroshima like shock-wave.
Secondly, and less to do with plot interpretation, I want to say that this was a movie that was totally up my alley, and I hope many others can say that too. I am a child of the camcorder generation. If you were to rob my parent’s house, you (hopefully) wouldn’t find any lewd sex tapes, but you would find mortifying recordings in the form of a six-year-old Yooka in his E.T. footsie zip-up pajamas, whacking himself in the head with his trusty cardboard base from a used roll of paper towels, eagerly counting the seconds till Christmas by the “thonk-thonk-thonk” sound he made with it. I was a weird kid, and every foible is caught on tape. So yeah, I can never run for president. :)
I relate, and inject myself in personal, unpolished, home-video recordings. It was half of the reason Blair Witch hit me so hard. Psychologists also say it’s the reason why “reality” TV shows do so well in the US, despite the fact that most of them are God-awful. However, Cloverfield is far from God awful. The acting is good. The effects are great. The plot is good, but no extraordinary. However, if you are like me, and you award extra points for having all the ducks line up in a row, and still be initeresting, then maybe you’ll say that the plot is great. The bottom line is that 20 years from now, I know I can show the movie to kids (hopefully mine), and tell them that this is why the should watch out at wild parties, and I know I will totally freak the fuck out of them, because they won’t see any of the monster stuff coming, and they will have already related to the characters, and it will be too late for them to be cynical, and not care. Cloverfield is a good enough movie to pull you in if you don’t already know what it’s about. And it’s good enough to welcome you into it, and not burst the thinnest bubble of belief-suspension if you are willing conjure it for your own enjoyment. It’s as realistic as a Godzilla movie could possibly be, while avoiding obvious lulls.
But like I said before, see it in theaters, while the sound and spectacle surrounds you, because clearly, this is a movie where the star isn’t a human, or a CGI monster. The star is self-immersion itself.
50 Responses
great review! i feel exactly the same way
Awesome review. I agree 100%. Saw it last night and I really felt it was one of the most intense movies I had seen in a long time…mostly due to the nature in which is was filmed. I felt that the moments between characters were really well done and there was a surprising and welcome amount of humor in the whole movie (but not inappropriate humor in that slick blockbuster way). It fit.
**Spoiler***
One thing you didn’t mention was that Lil apparently survives, too. She made it out on the other copter.
did anyone see the thing that fell from the sky in to the ocean at the end at coney island?
a hint to where the monster is from?
and how come it takes place on may 23? i thought supposed to take place on 1-18-08.
I just saw it again. :)
I was really, really looking for it. I was sitting on that side of the theater (right side, of screen), so I think I had as good a view as I could, and I didn’t see it. I’d really love for someone to get a screener with it circled, or something.
And yes, that is a great point about the date. I can’t believe they held onto the title “Cloverfield” (which I still think is very weak), but they contradict the viral marketing websites as far as that established timeline. Then again, it’s not like they were filming in winter, so why go through the trouble of making it look like a winter night?
SPOILER
so, i still cant figure out what the monster really was.
but it was really crazy. i loved the way that they filmed it, because it felt so real.
it freaked my sh*t, let me tell you :D
the only thing i didn’t like was that there was no story line, really. No conclusion and no introduction, really.
i saw the thing that dropped into the water!
it pissed me off that not much was concluded at the end of the movie. However, i do believe that if they do make a sequel, i dont think itll be as good, just because i dont think theyll be able to use the camcorder pov this time.
I totally enjoyed this film. However I took my girlfriend with me whom didn’t read up or see any of the spoiler information (from the various sites and photos etc) and she was a little disappointed. Only because she didn’t know where the monster came from, why the army couldn’t stop it and finally if or if not we were able to kill the damn thing. The point she could not understand is , the film was shot from a first person view of those who were stuck in this hellish situation and did not have the luxury of knowing a real why and what they were dealing with. Yes, it would have been great if maybe the military found the tape and gave some type finishing account of how the scenario ending but that didn’t happen. All in all I loved the film and can’t wait to get it on DVD.
I have been keeping up with all of the Cloverfield hype since the beginning. I was terribly disappointed in the movie. Too many unanswered questions after it was over. The whole theater was in shock and upset that there wasn’t more. It was the first showing here, so everyone was standing in line full of anticipation. I couldn’t wait to see it! I was so dizzy during the movie, that it was hard to keep up. People were griping that they couldn’t see and nothing was explained. When? Where? How did the monster come to be? Great concept, storyline, acting, and special effects. Just bad cinematography. It had so much potential. I would have liked to see more of the monster storyline and less of the hand-held free for all.
Hey, I just wanted to bring this up…
Since the whole immersion, etc, is ruined by the simple fact that we know this is a movie.
Wait 10 years or so, then look for someone who hasn’t ever heard of the movie. Put the DVD in a blank DVD case, labeled “CLASSIFIED” and make the paper look a bit old, or not. I’m not sure what works better.
Then put it in your garage in a box and invite the person over. If they haven’t heard of it, and you burn the DVD to a blank disk or something (To remove all the disclaimers, title, ETC. Just label it “Cloverfield Site SD Card” or something).
Watch it with them. They’ll be freaked. It’ll become obvious it’s a movie, but by that time (if they can survive just watching the Party part) they’ll realize it was a movie and all good fun.
The fact that we know it’s a monster movie kinda ruins it. I like how the audience basically becomes a member of the DoD who has never seen the video before.
Anyway, good luck keeping the disk for a while and finding someone who hasn’t heard of the movie. It would be really fun…
Or show it to your kids later. That would work, too.
I thought it was one of the best movies i’ve seen in years.
Reading some of the comments, i wanted to answer some of there questions.
Chelsea, you said it didn’t have a story line. That’s what made it great. It basically had you in there shoes, you don’t know what you would do in a situation like that. Leaving you trying to figure what they’d do next. Either they left Manhatten or they go back to save Beth.
Another thing, this was also why the movie was a great film. You didn’t know where the creature came from or what the creature was, going back to the charaters. They had no clue what the fuck that thing was. So in a way why should we know, it was shot in first person view. Meaning we only have the same information they have.
Yet again, something that really had me thinking was why the hell the thing wouldn’t die or be harmed.
This question might be a spoiler.
But….
Did anyone notice after the helicopter crash and how Hud had went back to get the camera, and the creature went above him. Didn’t it look a bit smaller than it actually was, i mean the angle and everything but i mean something just didn’t look right?
and there’s no such camera that can withstand a nuclear blast if there was one
I’ve seen this question about the size of the monster at the end in a couple of places. However, no one has yet suggested what I immediately assumed. This isn’t THE monster, it’s an offspring, only about 10 or 15 feet high.
The thing is spreading itself.
Spoilerfilled?
They don’t explicitly say it was a nuclear blast. Someone said the flash at the end is white, while nuclear bombs flash orange. Or…maybe it was the other way around.
Anyway, If this Cloverfield creature comes from the deep blue sea, (er. underwater) then that means it’s been living with the pressure from all the water above it, crushing down on it’s body. This hardens it’s shell/skin/whatever, which makes it insanely good protection against missiles/explosions, etc.
Also, I’ve been thinking about Nuclear explosions before…they explode above the ground and the shockwave/explosion spreads out from there, all around. If the camera was any distance away (except maybe directly under it) then it would have not been hit with the full blast from the shockwave or the flames/explosion, whatever. I’d be more worried about the EMP which disables electronic equipment..(Nukes give off a EMP-like blast, right? Oceans Eleven? It would disable the camera, would it wipe an SD card?)
Also, the camera was under the rubble from the bridge. If you look at how explosions work…they sort of skim over the groud, so if you’re in a trench (they’re in a trench, basically, it’s a creek flowing through) then you miss the main force and explosion from the bomb…
I think I just repeated myself.
As for the bigger/smaller creatures in the film…I’m not really sure. I seriously don’t remember Hud zooming in after he picks up the camera and sees the thing.
Also, I don’t recall seeing the red gills on the big one. I might have just missed it. Not sure.
As long as I’m posting: Someone asked why Hud says: “They were like dragging me away. I wonder why…Maybe they wanted to make me their queen”
That’s no a direct quote, but yeah. The little ones are probably dragging him back for the larger one to eat. A symbiotic relationship, where the big one brings the little ones places, then the little ones bring the big one food? No idea.
Long post, maybe? I love talking about this movie =D
Eric i actually was thinking the same thing. I mean they didn’t really notice or hear it coming until it was to late. Maybe there is a little one that evolved or something….
Still thats what i like about that movie it keeps you thinking.
The city was destroyed! Rob and Beth die and the monster or monsters live. And many, many people die (mostly by the military trying to kill the beast). This movie is awesome!
can anyone confirm if the fan art that was doing the rounds is the actual monster and it’s offspring?
excellent review. I couldn’t imagine drinking during the movie though. I’d puke
Glad so many liked the review and the movies. Sad that some people didn’t. It does seem to be a polarizing movie. There were plenty of people at the showings I went to that hated it, but they seemed to be outnumbered by those who liked and loved it. Maybe we are seeing the development of a niche style here. Maybe in the future, there will be a subgenre for “First-Person” style documentary fiction.
On to address comments.
I would have thought that after seeing the trailers, and the opening minute of the movie, people would have known that no definitive answers would be forthcoming from the fottage itself. There probably isn’t a case summary on the government-held original tape of John Kennedy getting assassinated. Likewise for any 9/11 footage they have. The recording itself is not supposed to be edited, things like that go in files. I have no doubt that in that “reality” where New York is wiped out, the government has many more answers than we do. But if you give that away now (as opposed to a sequal), it breaks down those beautifully constructed pillars that allow us to suspend our disbelief to some degree.
So yeah, not realistic if someone comes on screen and tells us everything. Sometimes what is left unsaid is more compelling. It is perfectly fine to watch it again, and make your own conclusions as to what “probably” happened. If anything, it allows us to keep it going on our own, prolonging the life, and adding to the mystique of a movie, where a definitive endpoint doesn’t let us.
As far as what BrokenTripod said in the movie. Your counterpoint of tricking people into thinking it wasn’t a movie doesn’t hold water either. For the library example to work, you would also have to find someone that has no knowledge of history whatsoever, because the erradication of New York City (either by Monster, or subsequent bombing) would probably surpass the knowledge of the Holocaust or the atomic bombing of Japan as the single most well-known event in all of history. If the person knows that New York is still there, then according to your statement, they cannot suspend their disbelief. Immersion is never absolute. I don’t think we need to get to that point to allow ourselves to get wrapped up deeply into a story. If you have ever done so, then on some level, you must acknowledge this.
I will say that I think we can both agree that the commercial blitz didn’t help anything. Half of the reason that Blair Witch knocked everyone’s socks off that first summer was because all the marketing for it made it seem like it was footage of Bigfoot or something. A lost tape that was edited to film grade, and “mostly” debunked by experts, but they want to show it anyway. Obviously, that is something they can get away with when it’s in the back woods of Maryland or Virginia, but not so much when it deals with the annihilation of New York by a skyscraper sized monster.
I agree with Stephen about Hud’s “Up-close and personal” with it. It did seem like the scale was too small for something that hip-checks skyscrapers. The way I saw it, it was 10-20 stories tall. Then again, since he was looking straight up, the angle itself prevents us from having an accurate sense of scale. For our minds to translate 2-dimensional images into 3-dimensional ideas, we need things in the background. Things we are familiar with, and have an understanding of their size, like treese or buildings. We were looking straight up, and I don’t recall if there were any clouds overheaed, but even if they were, since they also can vary so greatly in distance from the observer and in size, that wouldn’t have helped either. So yes, I agree with you, but there may not have been any realistic way to avoid that. If it really happened, I think it would look almost exactly the same.
Also like I said before, I think people are falsely assuming that the blast was nuclear. If it was, then yes, even if the camera is able to rest in a pocket of rubble, and not get damaged by blunt trauma, or heat damage, the electromagnetic pulse would wipe all data clean. If anything, that’s another reason to think that the blasts were conventional ballistics.
Also, if you’ll remember, the final orange blast (my point was that nuclear blasts are always blinding white - light so intense that it burns into things instantly. See this page for examples from Hiroshima (not graphic) - http://www.csi.ad.jp/ABOMB/RETAIN/shadow.html ). was not the only bomb-blast heard in the morning. They were still firing at him that morning, as Rob and Beth were limping around the park. There are a few different ways to explain that, but what makes the most sense to me is that they were dropping a combination of Fuel Air Bombs (for “Big Mamma”) and Bunker Busters (for her babies in the tunnels). The combination would also effectively end New York City. Casualties in buildings where this happens would be catastrophic. But unlike a nuclear bomb, there wouldn’t be significant radioactive contamination. It also allows for an untargeted site (like Central Park, with few major tunnels) to give people there a better chance of surviving.
So that’s what I got. But I’m not an expert, I just read up on things.
It wasn’t a nuclear blast. It’s called “Hammer Down” where an aircraft(s) releases its entire payload onto one concentrated area, Central Park, to completely obliterate a designated target. Why would they nuke the entire city if the monster is far from it? Think about it, when the soldier talks about leveling the city, he mentions a hammer down. This is what he means. Why would someone issue a nuclear attack on a city where they know there’s probably lots of people still not evacuated? And it they would issue a nuclear attack, how would they find the tape under all this rubble? I know they found it by accident. but you gotta think about scenarios like this. We never had a monster attack an over-populated city like NYC, so the army tries all of its tactics and finally comes up with a Hammer Down. They don’t want to risk a nuclear strike because they know that the outcome is bad, considering it would take years to make the city like it was before the attack. So many reasons why it can’t be a nuclear attack…
stevo: Watch the movie!
It’s not the monster. The monster is much less whalelike.
Yooka: Touche’. I’m sure there’s some people who don’t know much about 9/11 or New York who might fall for this, but it’s really not likely that you’ll achieve total immersion (As you said, it’s practically impossible).
I think the scary thing about Manhattan is that the US Government could be allowed to bomb it. It is on the East Coast, and I think the winds would blow it out into the Atlantic, which could be the position the president/whoever takes.
Sure, plenty of people would die, but it would kill the monster that potentially killed more than a nuke.
I don’t think it was a nuke, I’m just playing Devil’s advocate.
Uh, if they had to bomb, say, LA, then the fallout would have an effect in Arizona, etc, while in New York it ends up heading toward the ocean.
Anyway, I think if it was really 6:45 (They said this at the end, I think), then it’s likely that it was not a nuke, and that the army was trying to save as many people as possible by not bombing at exactly 6:00.
this is wat i think im not gonna go to deep but may 23 i think has something to do with lost so does abril 27 but that just my opinion i dont no wat the realtion ship is but… o yeah and 1 more thing 4 some reason the weird message is there on tatsuago and in the begening of lost the guy in the video was asian possibly japanese hmm
Ok, so here is what I think. The things that fell of of ‘Clover’ are a type of ‘lice’. As in a type of creature who feeds off of ‘Clover’. There are fish who cling to other sea life, such as with sharks. They could have been dragging Hud away so that many of them could feed on him.
‘Clover’ had red the red ‘lungs’ the whole time.
I think that if there were multiple monsters, that the group would have heard something when they were with the army.
I’ve heard a theory that ‘Clover’ followed the tanker. It was the first thing that it destroyed. Where do tankers come from? Off-shore oil rigs. Chances are, that when they were drilling they disturbed ‘Clover” and therefore it followed the Tanker to New York. Now, imagine being in a blind rage and following the thing that pissed you off. When you destroy it or come out of the rage, which ever comes first, you’d become confused right? Chances are you’d have no clue where you were. So it might put you in that rage again, or you would panic. Hence the attack on the city.
Also, was it bacteria or a type of venom that reacted with the human body? They didn’t mention that at all. Could it have been a disease? Humans could clearly get infected from the bite, and the way the army was acting you could catch it from contact with the blood. So why didn’t Lily get infected?
It definitely was not a nuke. There would be way too high of a risk involved. The only way I could see them using one is if it was a threat to the entire country.
And there was something else I was going to address but I can not remember for some reason.
Oh yeah! The date 1-18-08 was the movie release date, and was never meant to be taken as when the movie takes place. It takes place in May 09.
hELL OF A MOVIE. A bit rough on the stomach at first.
I work in Downtown NYC so seeing this movie hits close to home for me. I felt like I was watching a nice blend of The Blair witch project (camera style) War of the Worlds and 28 days later. But all in all this movie kicked ass.
There are many clues out there to where this “Clover” came from. After checking out all the ‘Viral Marketing Sites” (Slurpo and what ever the hell the drilling company was called) they have some really cool footage of the monsters possible origin. Theres 3 videos out there from foriegn countries. They are mock news casts of the Drilling Platform in the Atlantic drilling for Slurpo’s secret ingredient and suddenly all hell breaks loose and the plaform - descibed as the biggest in the world - is lost. The footage shows a helecopter’s view from a hand held approching the platform and then suddenly the platfom caves in. You clearly see machine guns firing into the water and silhoettes of something. The best part is a handful of escapees in a small boat and of course, someone is filming when suddenly objects from the wreckage go flying into the sky.
Points I ponder:
1. What the hell did this thing do to create that huge explosion at the begining of the film when they are on the roof?
2. Where can I get a battery that lasts so long for my video cam?
3. I agree that the spider things falling off clover were parasites..
4. How is it that Beth survived being pulled off a rebar rod and not have a collapsed loung or bleed to death?
5. The monster in the park that Hud gets the close up on.. You can see trees behind it.. I do not think it is the same one that hipchecked the woolworth building or reached out and ripped down 91/2 57th st. It ws much smaller.
6. The thing dropping into the water at the end- I didnt see it but some little punk behind me rubbed it in everyones face around my section of the theater that he did.. anyway, this confuses me because if all the viral marketing points to this thing being a sleeping monster beneath the sea, what the hell was that? Is this JJ’s way of leaving that much more to the imagination?
Sorry so long. Insomnia and all, but I loved this movie, even if my stomach didnt appreciate the motion sickness it caused!
BTW - the visual effects were awsome. The brooklyn Bridge scene was stunning. If New York was attacked by a 60 story monster, this is what it would most likey look like.
It only looked small because Hud was zooming in with his camera, at a vertical angle that makes huge objects seem small when you’re looking at it from a bottom-up kinda view.
Pr0LiFiX:
I’m agreeing now. The 2 interchangeable heads for the Hasbro toy are probably open mouth and closed mouth. I saw a few comparisons, and the monster looks waaay different with it’s mouth open…mainly because it’s mouth is open and it’s face is streched out to hell.
It almost seems peaceful at the end of the movie, when Hud is eaten…Which is weird, since it’s been bombed so much.
If you notice he has the camera off through some parts. So there could be hours in between. Now assuming that it was fully charged, it could definitely last that long. When they are with the military the camera is off for awhile.
I totally agree with the Beth part. I didn’t understand that at all. It’s possible that they didn’t show all the blood, but we should of atleast seen some.
They are doing a 4-part manga prequel of a japanese high school student who was on the tanker i think? well he was on a boat and its supposed to explain some stuff.
I barely saw the thing at the end. It goes by so fast that if you aren’t looking you wouldn’t know.
The big explosion could be from the tanker. Like a secondary one. Afterall, I believe it was filled with oil and other fuels.
No, the explosion was NOT from the Tagruato tanker. Hud zooms in on the tanker when the everyone is trying to escape on the Brooklyn bridge and the explosion happens when they are viewing the city from Rob’s apartment. So either the monster burrowed underground and tripped a gasline, or I really don’t know. Keep in mind that the first roar was minutes from the explosion. When I first heard it, it freaked me out because the movie theatre is so damn loud it felt as if the monster was standing behind me, lol.
I kinda hated how Jason was the first to die. He was my favorite character because he and Lily get off to a bad start and when Lily sees the monster crush the Brooklyn bridge with its tail, it was pretty obvious because Hud kept on zooming in on Jason and he was like, “What? What are you saying?” and all of a sudden there’s this loud-ass roar and when he gets crushed I was like, “JASON!!!!” XD
I had this theory that maybe the Tagruato tanker was carrying the monster, but then I thought more realistically that maybe the tanker was there to find the monster. It seems big enough to hold the monster. Maybe it was on patrol. It probably was seeing as how it was conveniently placed by the Statue of Liberty moments before the first roar, the monster takes the liberty head and throws it….but that debunks my past theory about the monster burrowing underground and tripping the gasline to cause the explosion. See what’s so confusing about the time of events?
Pr0LiFiX: I think Rae was talking about a second tanker, not the one we see capsised.
I personally agree with you, it was probably a gas line…Or I seriously don’t know.
I loved the bass in the movie, too! It was so good at giving the audience a sense of fear when the monster roared.
If it was a gasline that was tripped, it was probably one of the parasites. I mean, there’s no way the monster could do it, since it threw the Liberty head a minute or so after the explosion. God, this is confusing… 0.o
Oh, I just wanted to tell everyone that Jarvis has his own Cloverfield blog up.
You can check it out here: http://cloverfieldarg.wordpress.com/
…Could the satellite falling have been the thing that caused the explosion?
Totally random question. I’m not sure when/what/whatever about the bold futura satellite. I didn’t get a chance to read it before the site went down..And it’s up again. Maybe I’ll read it.
I dont really agree with the gas line theory. The explosion was high. Almost looked as if the middle of a skyscraper exploded. You can see it in the trailer. But I guess we’ll have to wait for the next movie…Cloverfield 2 -Views from the hood, yo!” LOL
Do you guys remember when Hud gets a good aerial view of the monster from the helicopter just as the blackbird fighter jet bombs the shit out of the monster? It had a really large backside that seemed to be pulsating with batches of caccoons, like the parasites. But I know as soon as the monster was bombarded it looked fucking pissed like, “AAARRGH!!! I’M GONNA KILL YOU ALL!!!” 0.0
It grabbed onto the building with it’s really long front arms and legs. And when it just popped onto the screen and hit the helicopter I could’ve sworn I jumped 10 feet into the air full of fright. It seemed very wide like a huge spider of some sort, but in the last scene it looked more human-like. Trick of the camera, I guess.
….they better wait on the sequel, in my honest opinion.
@Exastur
2. Where can I get a battery that lasts so long for my video cam?
Anywhere. The movie is only 90 minutes long. Not only that but there are sections where we see old footage where he’s either rewinding or turned the camera off.
Some are good for “1.5 hours” of usage, and some a bit longer than that. It’s not entirely unheard of. Then again it depends on what kind of camera, what you use on it, and how you’re using it.
Obviously when he uses the light it’ll drain the battery faster, especially since they most likely used it for 2 miles worth of walking or so. But regardless, it’s not that uncommon.
Wow! Do you work for Sony…LOL
Well, it’s been a fun ride with the viral marketing but I’m getting bored of Cloverfield now. The movie was great, everything about it. But that’s about all that I wanna see. Chasing down info about a movie that we’ve all been waiting months to see and finally saw it only to find more info is just enough. I mean, no offense, but I’m getting sick of it. I loved the time everyone spent on the blog, but this cool cat is gonna make haste and take his departure.
Cheers,
- Pr0
The creature is man-made!!!
@ Exastur - No, but I guess working retail [best buy] brings out the knowledgable info in me that’ll help sell you a product? :P
who cares about th battery life of the camcorder. the simple fact that the actions of the people in the movie are soooo unrealistic is what should be questioned. I mean honestly, GIANT fucking monster attacking NYC - everyone is going to get the fuck out of dodge. No one in their right mind is going to go back for anyone. If my wife was in “Beth’s” place, to hell with her, let her die. I am not going back and risking getting my self killed. fuck that. And everyone knows they are thinking the same thing. this movie was a big stinking pile of shit. the only reason it made as much money as it did is because of all the “viral” hype. The same thing happened for the Blair Witch, BUT, as soon as word of mouth got out on how stupid that movie was, not only did box office receipts dry up, the movie was pulled and put on DVD. the same will happen here. this movie was a waste, and so are all the people dumb enough to pay to see. thank heavens i didn’t. snuck into theater after paying to see Bucket List, which is a much better movie.
But those are two entirely different movies, Rob. Your opinion is yours and I don’t blame you if you hate the movie. I mean, there’s gotta be one person who hates a certain movie, a couple hundred, but who cares? If you want a movie to be realistic, then what’s the point of seeing it if it’s just a bunch of people screaming bloody murder zomg its da monster! I would rather a movie be unrealistic so that I would not know what to expect, understand?
Besides, Cloverfield became the best opening movie for January!
Oh, and if anyone is interested, I started my own blog. It’s not spamming, Jordan, if someone wants to add traffic from their site…I think…at least let someone know it exists, lol. xD
http://prolifix.wordpress.com/
Just wanted to say two things. 1. I loved the movie. 2. I am not starting my own blog.
1. Not starting my own blog.
2. Rob: Do you hate….ALL other movies, then? Seriously, Star Wars can’t be good, it’s too unrealistic. Come on, EVERY movie is unrealistic (Even the ones based on true stories. Or inspired by them. They throw in as much sex and violence as possible).
BTW: Everyone did get out of the city. Everyone but the army and those stuck there. Rob goes back for Beth because, seriously, if you think of how huge Manhattan is and how many blocks the monster can get through…There’s not a very high chance that the monster and you will be in the same area. And if you were, the army is probably there killin’ it.
It’s almost perfectly safe to walk around Manhattan if there’s a monster (Depends on the monster’s speed). Just listen for the gunshots and walk in the opposite direction.
BTW: Someone should notify his wife about his heroics.
Oh snap. Rob got served!
haha, I can imagine myself walking down the street. I hear a roar and see the monster and army fighting each other and quickly turn around, whistling a song and walking casually. “Guess I can’t go that way.” XD
I really liked the movie, I liked how they didn’t really explain things even though it is aggravating to not know what is happening and it leaves you with tons of questions I thought it worked out well. If you think about it, that was more realistic– if some giant thing attacked a city, how would anyone know anything about what it was, where it came from, what is was there for or anything else?
However, I am hoping they will do some type of sequel or possibly release a special edition DVD with more information that explains things.
Also wanted to mention that here in Chicago we have lots of crazy tunnels as well, and I found the tunnel sections creepy partly because of all our tunnels here. For example you can get around (walking) whole sections of downtown Chicago without ever going aboveground if you know what you’re doing.