Cloverfield Director, Matt Reeves, gives an Interview!
Posted on December 15th, 2007 at 4:57 pm in |

Hello everyone
Matt Reeves, the director for Cloverfield, has been taking interviews. Here is what he has to say:
MTV: ‘Star Trek’ Trailer Boldly Goes To ‘Cloverfield’ Audiences
… “Cloverfield” director Matt Reeves has told MTV News that Paramount has picked his monster flick as the venue to unveil the “Trek” trailer …
IGN: Exclusive: Cloverfield Director Speaks!
… when the first draft of the script came out it was Cloverfield. It’s always been Cloverfield …
… anyone who has seen the clips from the film knows that “Cloverfield” is the case name that the government has assigned to whatever or whoever is doing all that destruction in New York … “In the way that the Manhattan Project was the name of that program, that’s what this is” …
“We really wanted to make a movie where essentially, at the end of the day, it’s this giant monster movie, … and do it in this very [realistic] style as if it was found footage. [You] get to know these characters, and in a certain way [we got to] make a character relationship film.”
IGN: Exclusive: Cloverfield Director Speaks! Part Two
“The inspiration came from the poster of Escape from New York,” says Reeves of that darn head. “The poster had an image on it of the head of the Statue of Liberty and that image was nowhere in the movie! And it’s an incredibly provocative image. And that was the source that inspired [producer] J.J. [Abrams] to say, ‘Now this would be an interesting idea for a movie.’”…
…The idea, according to Reeves, is that since this footage has been found and is unedited, every time the camera cuts out indicates a jump forward in time. And in fact, the only cuts in the film are when the camera gets turned off…
… “That’s the way that our film is incredibly different from Blair Witch … So you’re going to see the monster, you’re going to see huge-scale destruction, you’re going to see a lot of crazy stuff!”
ShockTillYouDrop: Cloverfield Director Speaks!
At the last minute, when we were shooting the trailer, we wanted people to know - ’cause we hadn’t created the monster yet - that it was a giant monster movie, we wanted a tease of that. I jumped to the microphone and said the line, “I saw it! It’s alive! It’s huge!” And one of the most amusing things is I had come home and someone on the web had taken that section and started to do an analysis on it and thought I said, “It was a lion.”
IESB: EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Cloverfield Director Matt Reeves!
[Slusho is] a connection, obviously, back to a reference to Alias and it’s part of the involved connectivity between that and there’s a - I don’t know what you could call it - a sort of “meta-story” that is part of - almost like an origin story - that is connected.
Is it true … the date in the film is actually [1-18-08]? No, that’s not true. The two ways people referred to the movie where by its codename, Cloverfield, because there was knowledge of that, and just by the date. … The date is just the date we come out and when everyone gets to see the movie.
Finnaly the “its a lion” thing has been debunked! Yay!
Enjoy the weekend and stay safe!
Questions? Theories? Pictures? www.brit_intel_harmon@hotmail.com
19 Responses
debunked indeed!
LOL, how ironic that Matt Reeves was the one who said, “I saw it! It’s alive! It’s huge!!!” Maybe now he can somehow show some images of the monster…maybe, concept art or I don’t know…something! I wanna see the monster!!! OMG!OMG!OMG!OMG!OMG! C’mon, Matt Reeves!!!
Oh, well, maybe Jarvis is the monster! :D
lol Pr0
You mean for the past six months we’ve been argueing over what that dman line was, just for the Director to debunk it? Man that’s gotta hurt some people. I can honestly say I believe in the line “it’s alive” since the begining, but yeah.
Maybe we’ll get to see the monster by Chirstmas. That would be an awesome chirstmas present.
I wish he would have debunked the lion line months ago. I don’t think we’ll get to see the monster until 1-18.
lol, Jarvis, I had to get the truth out. :3
and here’s another one (for some laughs): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAmPwGiIwzk
Pr0 i just watched that video and i must say…very impressive!
Do you think you can e-mail me all your cloverfield relevent youtube videos and pictures please?
I would like to do a special little post compiling all your stuff :-)
http://www.brit_intel_harmon@hotmail.com (or) http://www.jarviscoxwell21@hotmail.com
Cheers :-D
Uh, okay, I sent you an email.
I hope the email went through, this time. :(
Oh, okay, looks like you did get my email, this time. :D
Has anyone else noticed that Matt Reeves looks like David Spade in that photo with JJ Abrams? OH NOES! lol, well, I bet you we’d find more clues about Cloverfield by zooming in on the computer screen mounted behind Matt Reeves. Are they in a music studio?
Denny Crain.
lol, Jerry who are you talking about?
And Jarvis, since you’re making a post with my stuff, do I get a medal or something? :)
Maybe I get to be on the “some of the people that contribute” list. XD
is there any other reason to think the baddy tunneled under the city than the wave’s in the water?
’cause that picture is taken in the morning…sun is behind the perspective point, we know it all started happening around midnight/1am. in addition, the city is already trashed, and there are helicopters in the picture as well, so this is well into the rampage of said baddy. if its that far after the fact, there wouldn’t be ripples in the water if it swam, or if it tunneled.
i don’t think you can take anything in the poster as “information”, other than the head of the SoL is gone, and the city is being trashed by a 3 fingered (clawed) baddy.
Hey guys, turns out there is a new trailer, but it’s more of a TV Spot.
What Jason says is interesting, though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aOy-2DEG8k
“You don’t know what we saw. The point is, it’s still here.”
nifty that it was said in the interview too, that this didn’t actually happen on 1/18/08…think somebody else had that idea…oh yeah, me…
VERY IMPORTANT POST:
Hey guys, I was doing audio analysis on the scene where Marlene expands and explodes and I found something very interesting. I will post the youtube video on this site in a bit when I finish uploading.
@Pr0, i think i heard what ur talking about…kinda starts low, and rises in pitch as she goes boom, right?
No, no no, I found something more than that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8wZKsOpUHs