Cloverfield seen?
Posted on December 3rd, 2007 at 2:10 pm in |
Hello Everyone.
Yes, Cloverfield has been seen by yet ANOTHER person. Wow, at this rate the entire world would have seen it before its official 1-18-08 release date ;-)
Here is the link to the post: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34941
And if you computer is gay:
Hey folks, Harry here - got the following brief review of CLOVERFIELD…
Just saw CLOVERFIELD in a small screening in NYC. IT WAS AWESOME!
I know - you want to know more. Join the fucking club! You also doubt the validity of the claim. Well, I checked with folks to see if it had indeed screened. It was at a Viacom in-house screening with unfinished visual fx.Add to this - a quote that Moriarty heard one day whilst walking the picket lines from a famous type that had seen the film, but was not associated with it, that felt they had just made “STAR WARS”. Now - personally - that’s crazy Hyperbole… isn’t it?The film’s budget is too small for it to be that amazing… right? But… what if? What if there’s a payoff behind the mystery and the buzz. What if we’re a month and a half away from a film that we’ll all remember the promotion for - and remember when nobody knew what it was called… when the world was thinking H.P. Lovecraft and Voltron… and something called SLUSHO? What if, we’re on magic time - getting ready for something… wonderful…. What if?
Here’s two additional reviews we’ve received: — The first of these two came from the alleged MARINE - the following reviewer wrote me back with a very detailed (regarding the screening, location, how he got in, etc… piece - but here’s what he had to say about the review that I’ve removed…
hey harry
saw you put my review up, so i’m glad it didn’t go to waste! that said, i wanted to let you know, that 2nd review, from the former marine or whatever, is 100% bogus. as incoherent as it is written, from what i was able to decipher, he definitely gets a lot of things wrong. most importantly, the protaganists are definitely not strangers, and the reason for the group moving in the direction they do once the attack is underway is explicitly stated by the leader of the group.
be well
and this:
hey harry
longtime reader, first time writer. i was at one of the Cloverfield screenings in NYC, and while the EFX and music weren’t finished, i don’t think the movie was that far off from being complete. anyway, i am a big Lost fan so JJ Abrams’ involvement, coupled with the amazing viral marketing campaign they have used to promote the film, had me really fired up about seeing the film. just wanted to preface with that before sharing my thoughts, which i will keep as spoiler free as possible:
regarding the monster:
i don’t know how much i want to give away b/c i think people are having a really good time hypothesizing about what the monster is, so let me just say that it’s humongous, it’s ugly, and you do see it in full view - no blair witch kind of thing going on here. SPOILER TAG i can also confirm the presence of smaller monsters (which look like the uglies from starship troopers kind of) / END SPOILER [put that in black on the website if you can]regarding the story:
again, don’t want to give much plot away, but there is a little of a backstory initially, but it doesn’t take too long to get to the party scene from the trailer, and once the statue of liberty head comes rolling down laffeyette street [i think?], the movie is off and running, with NYC devolving into chaos as people avoid being caught in the path of whatever is destroying their cityregarding the movie itself:
the scares are of the “gotcha!” variety, but that is to be expected given the use of the handheld camera, which, by the way, is your POV the entire film, so those with easy motion sickness be forewarned. there are some pretty funny one liners delivered by our cameraman to offset some of the tension with levity. there are certain plot devices which require a large suspension of disbelief (esp in regards to cell phone usage), but then again, if i’m going to buy in to the fact that a giant monster is ransacking my hometown, who am i to draw any line?overall i thought it was solid, definitely not great, and certainly not a genre redefinition. then again, my expectations were very high going in, so i might not be the best person to ask. my major critiques were:
1) it was somewhat predictable, and, as i stated before, the scares in the movie are less of the “creeping dread” variety and more of the “gotcha!” type.
2) again, i don’t want to end the hypothesizing fun, but the monster isn’t given much of a backstory or explanation. it just starts tearing NYC a new one one night.
that’s all i got. no need to credit me on this one, just wanted to get a review out there that doesn’t have everyone shouting PLANT!!1!”
Could it be legit…who in hell knows? This dude has stated stuff that we’ve theorised for a pretty long time now but he does he small details that could be true.
Anyway, Enjoy!
Questions? Theories? Pictures? www.brit_intel_harmon@hotmail.com
25 Responses
If I saw this movie. I would ruin it for everyone. It’s nice this guy (if he actually saw the movie) didn’t do that.
if it was an inhouse screening without the fx; how did they see the monster?
they say you get to see the monster & its ugly…but they weren’t don’t w/ the FX, so hopefully its even better in january
Personally i think its fake as shit…i mean, jesus christ, JJ Abrams has sworn everyone to secrecy, actors aint talking…fliming under a fake name….why the hell would he be stupid enuff to show the movie to an average Joe? And if he was…i bet he would have been offered a SHIT LOAD of money to keep his mouth shut untill the movie came out…
Its BS i think….
I think it’s a fake — no one outside of Paramount or Bad Robot knows much about the movie. JJ is keeping close watch if it ever gets leaked.
- Pr0
It’s a fake, no doubt about it. If anything he’s praticing for his real review of the movie. Hopefuly it’s better then what he makes it out to be.
I think that if there was a private screening, it’s from some guy sneeking onto the set while they where filming and put their own fx if and claimed that it wasn’t done for some ignorant few. Or J.J. could have let a fake version of the movie leak. Who knows.
i don’t think it’s real either. there are inconsistancies in the review compared to what we know already.
it reminds me of harry potter 7, when all the fake books were circling the web.
Does anyone else find it funny that the screening was shown through Viacom? Does anyone know what would happen if footage from the movie was leaked onto sites like youtube?
Check this out:
“On March 13, 2007, Viacom filed a US $1 billion lawsuit against Google and YouTube alleging massive copyright infringement, alleging that users frequently uploaded copyrighted material to YouTube - enough to cause a hit in revenue for Viacom and a gain in advertisement revenue for YouTube. The complaint contends that almost 160,000 unauthorized clips of Viacom’s programming have been available on YouTube and that these clips had been viewed more than 1.5 billion times.”
Viacom wouldn’t be stupid enough to screen a movie like that so that someone would accidentally leak the footage, much less, get a chance to watch it.
I like the part of about suspension of disbelief with the cell phones thing.
Well, why wouldn’t we believe cell phones to work? The country bought the cell phone use excuse on 9/11 didn’t they?
Well, I kinda believe the part about the “it doesn’t take long before we reach the party, during the movie”.
[...] Cloverfield seen?By Jarvisi don’t know how much i want to give away b/ci think people are having a really good time hypothesizing about what the monster is, so let me just say that it’s humongous, it’s ugly, and you do see it in full view - no blair witch kind …Project Cloverfield - http://projectcloverfield.com [...]
That part is believible. Who wants to spend 1/4 of the movie at the party when we all know how it’s going to end?
Since we know the film is going to be in the camera guy’s point of view, we have to think like we’re him. Unless he got the camera the day of the party and tested it out some, there’s only going to be what we saw in the first trailer, unless they trimmed it down some for the trailer. The party shouldn’t last more then 5 to 10 minutes.
the more i think about it, the more i don’t believe it. the entire premiss of this movie has been secrecy. for it to just be tossed out by a couple of nobody’s in NY seems a bit fishy.
then toss on Pr0LiFiX point about lawsuits…i call shenanigans
Yes, yes, I am right, because I am working on the Cloverfield movie…
…kidding, or am I? :)
shenanigans is my favourite restaraunt. Pro plays Hud in the movie.
Yep, ever wonder why the cameramen dies? Yeah, I hated playing that role. So, this is why I stalk these forums and the web, while I constantly leak information to you guys to get back at Bad Robot and JJ Abrams for not giving me a bigger role. I really wanted to play the monster, but they told me to put on a couple pounds. But then when I did, JJ decided that the monster was gonna be all CGI and so I just sat there, feeling rubbish, while I ate a twinky and threw eggs at Drew Goddard’s studio office. Oh, but hey, go and see the movie! It’s worth it.
- Hud?
Don’t take that seriously, Javis — I am not really Hud. xD
it’d be great if there was a shennaigans restaurant in the movie…and somebody made reference to showing the goat.
that alone would be worth the price of admission.
waiting, second only to office space in great comedy’s of the last 1/4 century
Pr- your banned from this website. Your constant “kidding” and “no offence” remarks have been recorded by myself and Jordan. We have decided to ban you from this website and from creating any new account while using your current IP.
Thank you and have a nice day.
Jarvis. just joking Pr0, but i had you going.
Goddammit, Jarvis, I swear to god, quit doing that! xD
I swear to god, one more time and I won’t reveal the monste–I mean, good joke.
- Pr0 (now I had YOU going, lol)
But no, seriously, don’t IP ban me! :(
Becides the kiddings and joking around, I wonder what it’s like for those people who are in the movie. They’re probably watched round the clock to make sure they don’t leak anything, and are going to be quickly replace if they do.
Moodyman, if they were replaced, the movie would be delayed.
And if it were delayed, well, people would go crazy.
“What do you mean, delayed until 2009?!”
1-18-09…the movie to bizar to show you in 2008…a year after the attack, the friends return to the scene for a reunion at central perk…
jesus that would be so boring….everyone crying n crap..